|
It is a familiar Israeli/American game. Israel threatens to
elect the even-more-hawkish Benjamin Netanyahu, and American
officials cower. Yet Sharon is unlikely to be less hawkish when
it comes to what counts -- the West Bank and Jerusalem. Will
American Jews who support former prime minister Netanyahu in the
expected contest for Likud party leader this fall be put off by
this U.S. interference in Israeli politics in favor of Sharon?
|
"In our view, the message to
Prime Minister Sharon from people in New York should be one of congratulations,
not one of new pressures."
-- A senior administration official
quoted by the New
York Times on September 4, 2005, in anticipation of Sharon's speech before the
UN this month.
|
|
|
Sharon may be congratulated for withdrawing from Gaza, but he
should also move forward on a positive program of recognizing
and dealing with a Palestinian state, as his Ministry of Foreign
Affairs claims in a
recent publication. Issued under the title "Paying the Price
for Peace: The Human Cost of Disengagement," its opening
paragraph concludes: "Israel’s ultimate goal is to establish
good neighborly relations with a Palestinian state." |
|
If this change in position is truly the Sharon government's
policy, U.S. officials may have reason to be hopeful about the
future of the peace process. Such a positive statement, however,
is at variance with Sharon's lifelong goal of undermining
Palestinian nationalism and denying its aspirations for
statehood. As evidence, we can add another quote, this one from
Dov Weisglass, a top adviser to Prime Minister Sharon in an
interview with Ha'aretz last fall:
"The disengagement is actually formaldehyde. It supplies the
amount of formaldehyde that's necessary so that there will not
be a political process with the Palestinians...Effectively, this
whole package that is called the Palestinian state, with all
that it entails, has been removed from our agenda indefinitely.
And all this with authority and permission. All with a
presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of
Congress. What more could have been anticipated? What more could
have been given to the settlers?"
What Weisglass means is that Palestinians
will have to be satisfied for the next
X number of years with a
fraction of their people having freedom, narrowly defined and
entirely controlled by Israel. Gaza and the northern corner of
the West Bank are one-third of the Palestinian population west
of the Jordan River. All of the main West Bank cities remain
surrounded by the Israel Defense Forces, separated by hundreds
of checkpoints that daily hassle the population. As the better
of two evils, the administration apparently wants Sharon
re-elected. This is a formula for more violence that will fuel
anti-Americanism throughout the Muslim world and lead to more
terrorism against America and our allies, at home and abroad.
|
U.S. support for Israel's intransigent position on settlement
growth in the West Bank, targeted assassinations, continued
annexation and internal separation brought by the apartheid
wall, and the encirclement and isolation of Jerusalem encourages
the worst elements in Israeli politics to create new "facts on
the ground" with impunity. In the April meeting with Sharon in
Crawford, Texas, President Bush
called for "no expansion of settlements," yet when the
settlement expansion continued, the administration fell silent.
It is an indication of how deeply ingrained is the Sharon view
that Times reporter
Steven R. Weisman notes that "the administration frequently
[calls] on Israel to ease checkpoints and roadblocks in the West
Bank and take other actions, but often in vain." We still ignore
the fact that the United States, more than any other country,
has the leverage necessary to further the peace process. All it
takes is the political will to exercise it. Unfortunately, the
Sharon tail continues to wag the American dog. And peace remains
elusive.
Update on the Gaza
Withdrawal
September 6, 2005: The Jewish
settlers have left, but the siege of Palestinian
towns and villages in Gaza that lie near the old
settlements continues unabated, according the
latest report of the Palestinian Center for
Human Rights (PCHR).
The Israeli
Defense Forces razed houses and leveled areas on
the eastern border with
Israel. They
have limited the number of Palestinians from
using the international border at Rafah – the
only way Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are able
to gain access to the international world. |
|
|
Additional Articles offsite
on this Issue |
|
Answers to the false
security claims supporting the Separation Wall
Gush-Shalom, Israel
|
|
Israeli violations of the
road map
Gush-Shalom, Israel
|
|
AIPAC lowers
profile on special aid request
The
Globe, Israel |
|
 |
|
Purpose? First the Israeli
government offered to send a fact
finding mission to see if they could
help. This was seen as stingy.
Now the Israeli government has
offered to send medical teams at
short notice to areas hit by
Hurricane Katrina. The
main concern for the government
focuses on not loosing the $2.2
billion it wants as reward for the
Gaza disengagement which a Lou Dobbs
poll in early August showed 93% of
Americans are against. Israel is
afraid Americans will spend this
money on Americans rather then their
settlers, occupying land in
violation of International law.
Meanwhile Saudi Arabia, one of the
first countries in the world to
offer aid (as Katrina made landfall)
along with Iran, both offered to
double their oil output to ease
supply shortages, two countries
Americans continue to vilify and
threaten. To date, 90
countries have offered aid.
The Israeli Government vs The
Israeli people:
Though
the Israeli government continues to
be its usual "we want something if
we do anything" self, the Israeli
citizens, led by
Ha'aretz Daily
are donating whatever they can to
help financially and materially.
This
distinction between the actions of
the government of Israel and its
people needs to be made. The
people of Israel, acting apart from
their government should be commended
and their help is gratefully
appreciated. Unlike their
government's motivation, the
donations and help from the Israeli
people have no strings
attached. The offers and
support of the people of Israel is
genuine toward the victims of
Katrina.
|
|
|
All Palestinians between
the ages of 16 and 35 are prohibited from leaving
Gaza, for example, a prohibition
that has been in effect for some time.
Unspecified attacks and
sometimes unreported attacks are taking place against
Palestinian civilians, for example, a 19-year-old living in
Rafah, which was reported on the
Rafah blog site. The PCHR reported paralyzing roadblocks on
the main road of the Gaza Strip. “Thousands of Palestinian
civilians were seen waiting at the roadsides to travel between
the north and south of the Gaza Strip.”
Moreover, the occupation in
the West Bank continues at full force.
During the period August 25-31, PCHR reported more than 30
military incursions into the West Bank,
the raiding of private houses and arrest of civilians. The IDF
continues to raze houses that have been constructed “without
permits,” and to confiscate land for checkpoints. In
Hebron, where Jewish settlers have
attacked Palestinians repeatedly, a new attack took place on
August 25. According to PCHR, they “threw stones and empty
bottles at a house belonging to Mohammed Hamed Abu 'Eisha. They
also demolished the fence of the house. {The IDF] were present
in the area, but did not intervene to stop this attack. The
house was damaged.”
Peaceful demonstrations
against the construction of the “Separation” Wall, especially in
the area of Bil’in, encountered unusually hostile force from the
IDF. Many were wounded and arrested, including members of the
International Solidarity Movement. The force used against the
demonstrators earned the wrath of a Haaretz editorial on
September 6 which wondered why more restraint wasn’t used,
especially since it had been so evident in the
pro-settlement demonstrations in
Gaza two weeks earlier. The Israeli
courts have also come down against the use of excessive force
used by the army, but to no effect.
The
Guardian is also reporting on the use of indiscriminate
killings by the Israeli army and its “culture of impunity.” Its
report stems from interviews provided by a group of former
Israeli soldiers called Breaking the Silence.
Conflicting reports
appeared on the strengthening of Jewish colonies in the
West Bank. On the one hand,
Ehud Olmert is supposed to have told the Jerusalem Post that
there was no plan to expand Israel’s largest colonies, but on
the other,
al-Jazeera reported that up to 3,000 units would be added to
Ariel (which lies deep within the West Bank), which would in
effect double the size of the colony, currently numbering
18,000. As we reported last week, the increase in the number of
new Jewish colonists in the West Bank
topped 12,000 for the first six months of 2005.
Currently, the
international border crossing for the Gaza Strip is at Rafah,
and for many years the Israelis have indicated that they would
never relinquish their authority to the Palestinians at that
crossing. But in the past year, negotiations with the Egyptians
have proved fruitful, and it appears that the Egyptians will be
allowed to deploy troops at the border to monitor the crossing
(and therefore be held accountable to goods passing through the
border). About this, the Palestinians are dubious, since it may
jeopardize their contacts with the
West Bank, where the heart of
Palestine lies.
The demotion of the old
Jewish settlement housing is supposed to be completed by the
middle of September, when the IDF is also supposed to be
leaving. According to
Haaretz, the IDF took the PA security commanders on a tour
of the sites.
A group of Palestinian youths who threw rocks at the troops
later on were fired upon by the troops, and one was killed.
Later the Palestinians launched a Qassam rocket into the
Negev. It was the first reported skirmish between the
Israeli army and the Gazans since the evacuation. Abbas is
expected to post thousands of Palestinian military around the
sites to protect them from people who might rush in and seize
plots.
Council for the National Interest
is an American non-profit organization pursuing policies seeking
to influence the current US foreign policy by redirecting it to
considering American needs and interests first here and abroad.
Currently the Middle East and US policies in the Middle East
constitute the focus for this organization.
Council for the National
Interest Foundation · 1250 4th Street SW · Suite WG-1 ·
Washington, DC 20024 · 202-863-2591; CNIF is a 501(c)(3)
organization.
|