Remember how in the 1920s Mitchell tried to
wake up the brass concerning the importance of air power? And
how in the early 1960s Vann predicted that the World War II
strategy of “blowing the communists back to the Stone Age”
would fail in Vietnam?
We learned with 20/20 hindsight that both
Mitchell and Vann were dead right. But because previous Army
chiefs turned a deaf ear to their prescient warnings, the
troops had to pay too high a price.
Remember when you, as a young Special Forces
officer, sounded off with your mates after the botched Iran
rescue attempt? For sure, some folks up at the top heard you –
just look at your Special Forces today.
Now that Vandergriff’s sounding the alarm that
the Army personnel system is broken, Gen. Schoomaker, perhaps
it’s payback time, your turn to listen up. The way things
stand, it certainly appears that you could save a lot of
soldiers serious grief if you meet with Vandergriff and hear
him out.
According to the major: “Ticket-punching,
rampant careerism and civilian corporate management policies
have virtually destroyed a vibrant Army that was once only
concerned with people, cohesion, teamwork and winning. Not
self.”
“The Army must change,” he says. “We have the
finest soldiers in the world and our leaders aren't corrupt,
but times have changed, and war has evolved from static fronts
to global terrorism. To ensure we uphold our oath to defend
America, the Army must transform itself.”
Since early in the Vietnam War, I’ve repeatedly
stated that the Army personnel system is playing a killer game
of musical chairs by embracing the Individual Replacement
System used in World Wars I and II.
Your antiquated personnel system produces
self-serving officers and senior noncoms obsessed with
micromanagement and risk-avoidance. And why not? One dent on a
fender in today’s Army zeroes out a promising career. Let’s
face it: Patton, Ridgway, Gavin, Emerson, Hollingsworth and
Hal Moore of “We Were Soldiers” would all have a hard time
making major today.
Vandergriff has been sounding off since 1999
about getting a bloated, officer-heavy Army off its
centralized butt. In fact, he’s briefed more than 30 of your
serving generals, as well as an Army vice chief of staff, the
secretary of the Army, students at the Naval War College and a
platoon of influential congressional representatives
concerning what needs to be done. While training future
officers at Georgetown University – where he was named the top
ROTC instructor of the year – he also somehow managed to write
an important book, The
Path to Victory.
His ideas sizzle with common sense. They’re so
good that a battalion of self-promoting “graybeards” –
Vandergriff’s label for the phalanx of retired generals who
hang around the Pentagon selling their knowledge to the
highest bidders and stuffing their pockets with green – are
shamelessly claiming a bunch of his reform ideas as theirs.
Even some of the briefings you’ve been presented on how to fix
your broken personnel system include complete, uncited
paragraphs lifted from his work.
Because his former Army boss at Georgetown
provided no support, Maj. Vandergriff did what he felt had to
be done all on his own in his spare time. He used vacation
days to brief the Pentagon and Congress, and he was so
committed that his wife drove him when his foot was in a cast.
After all the personal sacrifice, his reward for trying to
wake up a sleeping Army: a mediocre efficiency report.
When I was a corporal, my captain promoted his
sergeants and my general promoted his lieutenants. Back then,
everything was decentralized and based on trust. Soldiers
stayed together for years, and we got better – together – with
every passing day. No musical chairs. No career tickets to
punch. Just hard soldiering that was all about asking not what
you could do for your career, but what you could do for your
outfit.
So talk to Vandergriff. Then spot-promote him
to lieutenant colonel and give him a tank battalion in the
hottest zone in Iraq where he can implement his ideas – and
get out of his way.
Editor’s
Note